Subject: | Re: [OM] A New Twist on Weddings |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:10:36 +1100 |
I always assumed that this was Adams pointing out that if you ask a vague and stupid question, you get a stupid answer. Metaphysical GIGO. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 05/11/2011, at 6:42 AM, Moose wrote: > The logical next step is/was to try to find the Great question to which the > answer is 42. One obvious, possibly trivial, > answer is that the question is the one Jez posed. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Rex Horan at Turner Sims, Gerry Walden |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] A New Twist on ... [was A New Twist on Weddings], Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] A New Twist on Weddings, John Lind |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Lens design, bokeh, etc., Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |