The pixel count might be impressive at upwards of 20mp but the brief web
browsing I have done shows that the zoom lenses add only two or three
hundred dollars to the cost of the body. How much optical quality does one
get for a couple of hundred dollars? I suspect not very much at all.
jh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Time to move on? Flood delay.
> Sony and Panasonic for sure and maybe even Samsung. Those with
> electronics roots rather than electro-mechanical roots. But be careful
> that what you're getting is still a "camera". :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 10/22/2011 9:05 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>
>> My wife asked me an important question: Which camera brand is the most
>> innovative? I really had to think about it, but I believe Sony is. Canon
>> has
>> its moments, but Sony-Minolta has been and seems to remain so.
>>
>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|