Ken,
This difference is something I've been trying to understand lately. I
have been wondering if the E-30 is having metering issues, if it's a
jpeg processing issue...just what, exactly, is happening. I have hot
spots in images that I would not expect to have (jpegs), I closely watch
what my camera is telling me in regards to exposure as well, and still,
sometimes, I have images that contain overly bright areas I would not
have expected...on skin, mostly. RAW is not an issue.
I was wondering and hoping someone would bring that up and enlighten me. :-)
The only thing I can tell you with certainty is that when I switched
lenses I did not change anything but the shutter speed to compensate for
going from f2.0 to f2.8.
Candace
On 9/23/2011 2:52 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
> Yup, For some reason I've noticed that pretty subjects seem to just
> keep leaping in front of the 35-80. They KNOW the lens is special. :)
>
> Not that the 50/2 is a dog lens--hardly, but the two lenses did render
> differently. Colorcast is definitely different. In-camera JPEGs?
>
> (not that there is anything WRONG with shooting in-camera JPEGs, mind you)
>
> AG (this is what brain failure looks like) Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|