On 9/7/2011 6:33 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> The ripples and texture tell me that you used about a 50mm focal length
> from about 10 inches.
>> Nope, shoulda quit while you were ahead.
> Ah, but the "effective focal length and distance" was...
:-)
>> ROTFLMAO! After picking myself up, I have to say that's a great story.
> Quite inaccurate, but très amusant.
>
> Hmm. You didn't bark about the plaid flannel shirt!
Sorry, the reference was obscure to me.
And since, as so often, you had nothing quoted from the post to which you were
replying, I figured I could play dumb.
(Play?)
> Do you realize how hard it is to write "bowl of bowel-assist" and "regular
> bowl of regularity"? I think I sprained my pinky.
Glad you had as much fun writing it as I did reading it.
> I'm really happy to know that your system is happy and functioning in a
> normal and productive manner.
As am I. ;-)
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|