| Subject: | Re: [OM] m.zuiko 45 ƒ1.8 review |
|---|---|
| From: | Frank Wijsmuller <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:07:24 +0200 |
Here is another (Google translated): < http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dslrmagazine.com%2Fpruebas%2Fpruebas-tecnicas%2Fm.zuiko-digital-45-mm-f-1-8-la-prueba.html > Not bad at all. Regards, Frank 2011/8/22 Chris Barker > It might be a limited review, but it's the only one I've seen. Have you > written one for dissemination? > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Was: mount mod; Now M42-to-4/3 Adapter Thickness, Chris Trask |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Was: mount mod; Now M42-to-4/3 Adapter Thickness, Jim Nichols |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] m.zuiko 45 ƒ1.8 review, Wayne Harridge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] m.zuiko 45 ƒ1.8 review, Andrew Fildes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |