| Subject: | Re: [OM] m.zuiko 45 ƒ1.8 review |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:00:51 -0500 |
> YES. Sadly, I believe you are correct. I guess I need to become one of the brain-numbed minions they are marketing to. "Oooooo. Shiny!" Excuse my cynicism. I'm up to my eyebrows in budgeting. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] (OM) Missing data etc, Brian Swale |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Was: mount mod; Now M42-to-4/3 Adapter Thickness, Chris Trask |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] m.zuiko 45 ƒ1.8 review, Nathan Wajsman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] m.zuiko 45 ƒ1.8 review, Andrew Fildes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |