Is that the claim? That the aircraft were grounded due to ash from the
eruption of Eyjafjallajökull? If so then I don't know how you separate
the effect of the ash cloud (which also contains massive amounts of CO2)
from changes in emissions from reduced flying.
Furthermore, I'll still bet that measuring the effect on global
temperature is extraordinarily difficult and, in particular, assigning
responsibility to the two different parts of the equation. I'm still
willing to give 30 days to find a reputable citation.
Chuck Norcutt
On 8/9/2011 7:07 PM, Jeff Keller wrote:
> Three days of volcanic ash in the atmosphere?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Norcutt [mailto:chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) Totally OT - Climate Change
>
> I'll give you 30 days to come up with a reliable citation for that
> claim. Bet you can't. If you know how global temperatures are
> calculated you'll understand.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 8/9/2011 11:06 AM, Willie Wonka wrote:
>> I am outta popcorn and feel compelled to ask a stupid question:
>>
>> If just grounding the aircraft of few countries for three days
>> produced noticeable temperature change, how come that we still have
>> people claiming that human activities do not contribute to global
>> worming (I know I mispelled it, find the humor in it)?
>>
>>
>> Hot Boris. No, this doesnt sound right.
>>
>> Boris in heat? No this one doesnt sound right either.
>>
>> I think I am going to go with just Boris.
>>
>> Boris
>
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|