Subject: | [OM] OM4T+35/2.8, my favorite |
---|---|
From: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:14:16 -0400 (EDT) |
The CV40/2 original series came in an OM mount that might be a tad sharper than the Zuiko and still tiny, but the Zuiko has a better reputation for very pleasing rendering esp bokeh. The Zuiko may "punch above its weight." ;-) Chris on the list really liked his. The CV 40 is available in SLII version that I think is optically the same but no OM of course. http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1011361/0 http://tinyurl.com/4yxfob2 Either may cost a bunch. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 33, Issue 21, Bill Pearce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Earthquake in Lorca -- the aftermath, Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM4T+35/2.8, my favorite, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | [OM] IMG: Earthquake in Lorca -- the aftermath, Carlos J. Santisteban |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |