ML Archiv: Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh

Subject:	Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:48:04 -0500

Pretty flower, Film, OM and Zuiko 300/4.5. How more perfect can it get?

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Jim Nichols Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Jeff Keller Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Wayne Harridge Message not available Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Ken Norton Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, John Hermanson

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: Lilies for the 4th, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Date:	[OM] Lens Repair by a different method, Ken Norton
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Jim Nichols
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]