For that matter, a 180mm f/2 would be good too. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/20/2011 10:17 AM, Sandy Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Peter Leyssens
> <peterleyssens@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> ... an OM-3, a 90/f2 and a 50/f1.4.
>> ...
>> But the world has moved on and so have I. I have an E-P1 + 17/f2.8 combo
>> now that I adore and I'll be adding the announced 25/f1.4 ...
>
> Why not keep the 50 and get an adapter to use it on the E-P1?
> If you liked the 90, a 100 1.4 equivalent should appeal to you.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|