I'm very impressed with the lack of noise in the images from my K-5. This one,
a blue and gold iris, was at ISO200, the subsequent shots, of aquilegia,
campanula and alium are at increased ISO (up to 1250).
http://smu.gs/iz9n0y
It is so good that I don't mind using Auto-ISO for a great deal of my shooting.
Chris
On 30 May 2011, at 12:24, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> My Canon 5D (6 year old technology) is relatively noiseless at ISO 400.
> I can tell a difference between 100 and 400 but, unlike film, it's not
> much. I'm sure the 5D Mk II is much better and the Mk III (maybe in a
> year) will be better still.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 5/29/2011 10:47 AM, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>> Thanks, Nathan. Now I see why ISO 400 film is seldom mentioned here
>> ... and maybe the reason why Kodak doesn't manufacture a ISO 400
>> Ektachrome or EliteChrome any longer.
>> Realized the latter after I had posted asking for advice.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|