My Canon 5D (6 year old technology) is relatively noiseless at ISO 400.
I can tell a difference between 100 and 400 but, unlike film, it's not
much. I'm sure the 5D Mk II is much better and the Mk III (maybe in a
year) will be better still.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/29/2011 10:47 AM, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Thanks, Nathan. Now I see why ISO 400 film is seldom mentioned here
> ... and maybe the reason why Kodak doesn't manufacture a ISO 400
> Ektachrome or EliteChrome any longer.
> Realized the latter after I had posted asking for advice.
>
> Fernando.
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Nathan Wajsman<photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Provia 400F I remember as a decent film. But frankly, these days, if you
>> need to shoot colour at ISO 400, digital will blow any slide film out of the
>> water.
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|