I'm sure that they are, but the point about using LR, or Aperture, is that it
catalogues your images as well. I love it for that and I am well on the way to
being an organised photographer :-)
Aperture does most of what I need, given that I don't do layers at all.
However, I might have time before too long, if my employer accepts my offer to
go part time at half-salary. The idea of a longer weekend with which to make
myself better at something else is really attractive.
Chris
On 25 May 2011, at 15:46, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> Aren't all these Lightroom controls in Camera Raw, too?
>
>
> On May 25, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
>> The second , fair enough! But the first - LR has curves and as it has
>> sliders for Highlights, Lights, Darks and Shadows, it is easier to use than
>> curves in PS. It also has excellent noise control routines where you can
>> sharpen with adjustments and then kill both luminence and colour noise. Very
>> effective.
>> I know of a local wedding photog who does pretty much everything in LR. She
>> says PS is for drastic situations (like eye rebuilds!).
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|