Strictly speaking, I reckon it could have, if I'd've seen a need. But I would
have had to set up the tripod and such, and racked out the ISO to half a
billion, and the resulting image wouldn't have amounted to much, unless I was
getting points for taking pictures of a black car in a dark garage, which I
should have known would have been the case on _this_ list. <g>
Maybe next time.
Maybe I can get him to bring it out into the light of the full moon, then I
won't need a tripod.
--Bob
On May 10, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> I thought that your camera didn't need no stink'n light to take a
> photograph in. Or was everybody on DPReview wrong?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|