Subject: | Re: [OM] E-5 |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:08:24 +1100 |
It tends to wear the 24-70mm f2.8 most of the time - the 12-60mm is comparable and on occasion better (when the gods smile and all things are perfect). I also use the 50/1.8 and 70-200mm f2.8. I have the 16-35mm f2.8 but it doesn't seem to get much use. It's my studio queen so robustness isn't an issue. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 14/03/2011, at 10:59 PM, SwissPace wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > what lenses have found best when using 5D2 i.e comparable with 12-60 on E-5. > The biggest downside of the 5d2 is robustness but mine coped with being in a > tank bag in India fine which is probably the roughest I will subject it to > > Sent while mobile > >> get good results. In bright light or low light, I'd rather have my 5D2 - >> which isn't much heavier and not much more expensive. >> >> > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Some Sobering Photos from Japan, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-5, SwissPace |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-5, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |