These were mostly RAW images and heavily worked of course.
My take is that it is a predictable upgrade to the E-3, rather uncompetitive
for price and features but I always enjoy using. I know all the things that are
wrong with it (short dynamic range etc.) but still seem to get good results. In
bright light or low light, I'd rather have my 5D2 - which isn't much heavier
and not much more expensive.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 14/03/2011, at 5:08 AM, |-o-| wrote:
>> http://www.pbase.com/afildes/olympus_e5
>
> I like the colors, how much is raw or edited if I can ask ?
>
> I've been thinking of getting the E5 but I still need something
> to tip me over the edge, especially at that price.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|