On 3/1/2011 10:17 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> . . .
>> I pretty much of agree with CH's comments about the donuts. 1465 works
>> pretty well, with a whole background of them. The
>> large ones on the right of 1358 are kinda pretty, but I don't much like
>> the tight clusters on the left and the similar
>> ones in a couple of others. Still, worth the price to get the other
>> advantages of the small, light mirror lens. . . .
> The "tight clusters"? You mean you don't like the mirror type rendering or
> the cluster is too close to the object? (Sorry, the word "cluster" is new to
> me, checked the dictionary but still not understand very well :-))
I'm referring to the many small, close together, often overlapping bright rings
on the branches on the left of 1358,
upper right of 1566 and t a lesser extent, the upper right of 1418 & 1483.
Nothing you did wrong to cause them. Nothing to be done about them other than
blurring and lowering brightness and/or
some cropping. The are just a normal result of using a mirror lens.
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|