Yes, it was I, Nathan. The review on DPReview is pretty good, especially
compared with the E-5.
I'm tempted to stop faffing around and to go into debt, temporarily, for the
twin-lens kit. Patrick was complimentary about the 16-45 WR.
Chris
On 20 Feb 2011, at 15:50, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> If I remember correctly, the thread started with someone considering getting
> a Pentax K5. Having done a bit of research during the day I must say that it
> is looking very tempting indeed. Sounds like the DSLR Olympus should have
> produced instead of the E3/E5. And the lens selection is very tasty. And much
> to my delight, I can get one locally for roughly the same as at B&H, a rare
> occurrence indeed. Still not decided, though. Anybody actually shooting with
> a K5 here?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|