A good argument that I've heard before but tend to forget.
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/5/2011 7:00 PM, Carlos J. Santisteban wrote:
>
> 35mm is a good alternative in rangefinders. However, in the case of SLR
> lenses, I find an advantage of 40mm: they're more or less "standard" designs
> (both the Zuiko and Ultron 40/2 are modified double-Gauss, with a *reversed*
> front Gauss group) and usually very compact (the so-called pancakes) while a
> 35mm for SLRs *has* to use a much larger retrofocus formula...
>
> Cheers,
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|