LOL, true, I'm going to have to remember that argument for future use :D
--
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-486-2581
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work!
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook
On 1/17/11 8:00 PM, "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Of course it's a wet print. How else can you make a giclée print
> without spraying some liquid? :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 1/17/2011 6:37 PM, Chris Crawford wrote:
>> Why on Earth does he need a 5x7 enlarger to print from 6x9 film? My old
>> Beseler 23cII medium format enlarger handles 6x9 just fine. Scanning is no
>> insult to film if you do it right. Problem is, most people don't know how,
>> so they slam scanning as 'bad' just because they can't do it right.
>>
>> Yesterday on Rangefinderforum, someone who owns two of my prints said in a
>> thread there that my prints were incredible and that you had to hold one in
>> your hand to believe it. He went on to say that I was a master at wet
>> printing. They weren't wet prints, they were inkjets from an Epson R2400
>> (and he should have remembered that since my website says so and I told him
>> that when he bought them, but still...quite a compliment).
>>
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|