Of course it's a wet print. How else can you make a giclée print
without spraying some liquid? :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/17/2011 6:37 PM, Chris Crawford wrote:
> Why on Earth does he need a 5x7 enlarger to print from 6x9 film? My old
> Beseler 23cII medium format enlarger handles 6x9 just fine. Scanning is no
> insult to film if you do it right. Problem is, most people don't know how,
> so they slam scanning as 'bad' just because they can't do it right.
>
> Yesterday on Rangefinderforum, someone who owns two of my prints said in a
> thread there that my prints were incredible and that you had to hold one in
> your hand to believe it. He went on to say that I was a master at wet
> printing. They weren't wet prints, they were inkjets from an Epson R2400
> (and he should have remembered that since my website says so and I told him
> that when he bought them, but still...quite a compliment).
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|