Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Portait Redux, The Sequel

Subject: Re: [OM] Portait Redux, The Sequel
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:00:43 -0400
Yes, the Vivitar 283 and 285 are not particularly powerful.  The guide 
number is only 70 feet at ISO 100 and 28mm.  Not as much horsepower as a 
T32 with guide number 105 at ISO 100 and 24mm.  Powerwise, they're 
similar to the Sunpak 383 (no TTL) and 4xx (TTL) series.  In fact, the 
potato masher style Sunpak 522 is only about 1/3 stop brighter than a 
T32 if that much.  Maybe not even that since I think its guide number of 
120 is for 35mm coverage while the the T32 says 105 at 24mm (but I think 
24mm is a bit optimistic).  But I'll accept 28mm.  The advantage of the 
Vivitar and Sunpak flashes is a 4 or 5 stop range in manual power selection.

Chuck Norcutt


On 10/17/2010 3:37 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> BTW, did you know that the T45 is essentially two-stops
> brighter than the 285HV?
>
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz