Subject: | Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:51:03 +1000 |
Actually a 43mm square has a diagonal of 61mm, so it's about the size of 127 film (baby Rollei ?). ...Wayne > Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Could be. At 61mm diagonal it's somewhere between a 645 and a 6x6. > Maybe it's used in someone's MF digital back? > > Chuck Norcutt > > > On 9/16/2010 6:53 PM, Bill Pearce wrote: > > > > Here's the current Kodak line > > > <http://www.kodak.com/global/en/business/ISS/Products/index.jhtml?pq-path > =11 > > 937/11938> > > They seem to have discontinued all CMOS sensors for some reason. Only > CCDs > > left and they do make some big ones (up to 61mm diagonal and 50MP) > > Are the big ones flying high above us right now in secret spy > satellites? > > > > Bill Pearce > > > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor, Jeff Keller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor, Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor, Chris Barker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |