I have no difficulty calling it the "monster" since the Canon backpack
with 5D, 3 lenses, flash and bracket, chargers, batteries, cables, light
meter, manuals, etc, etc weighs 17 pounds. 21 if you add the 80-200 and
its case. The A1 is a whole lot less but still a bit bulky at times. I
really do need a pocket camera. I haven't had one since I stopped using
the Stylus Epic. Even that's a bit large for a pocket camera of today.
Chuck Norcutt
Joel Wilcox wrote:
> My mistake. I had thought when you were referring to the "monster"
> you meant the E-3, whereas it is clear you meant the 5D. Wrong
> monster! Sorry.
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Chuck Norcutt
> <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Nothing specific with respect to the E system or the 5D. Just the
>> general knowledge that large prints are generally better from larger
>> size original images. The difference in area between a 4/3 image and
>> 35mm image is more than that between a 35 size image and a 645 image.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Joel Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Chuck Norcutt
>>> <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Well, use the E410 for the joy of holding. But get the monster out when
>>>> you want those 16x20s.
>>> Chuck,
>>> On the basis of what do you say this?
>>>
>>> Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|