Subject: | Re: [OM] OM wides (21/2, et al) |
---|---|
From: | "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:07:26 +1200 |
This morning I had another good look at Gary Reese's lens tests, and now i have to say that I apologise for being so dogmatic about hem to Chuck (and Olympus). Yes, for the lenses under ? 135mm, there are actually some where the OM1 with mirror lock-up did better than the OM4T with mirror lock-up and aperture prefire. I'm not sure why I was so convinced that the OM1 was so useless, but now I see that that is not necessarily so. Brian Swale. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] So I finally tried an E-P2..., Wiliam Wagenaar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] September in New England, John Hermanson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM wides (21/2, et al), C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM wides (21/2, et al), Dawid Loubser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |