Would usaf targets be fine?
If not, why not email me the chart i can print out and use.
There was an issue with the server yesterday and a system restore of
some form wiped out 2/3 of everything that happened on zone-10
yesterday. And then last night it completely died on me....
AG
On Sunday, August 15, 2010, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, I agree. Bigger, better vertical target. Maybe a couple of
> identical "product boxes" as Moose suggested. Good high contrast
> targets. And be sure to use the full 1 meter allowable separation (5
> and 6 meters). Don't make it tougher than it needs to be.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Moose wrote:
>> On 8/14/2010 8:31 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> In case anybody is looking for my focus article, it disappeared. Evidently
>>> the server had an issue
>>
>> Apparently it agrees strongly with Chuck. :-)
>>
>>> and the database was restored which wiped out my article. I'll reshoot it
>>> to fully comply with Chuck's
>>> wishes so there is no question as to the validity of the tests.
>>
>> Bigger, better, vertical target, please.
>>
>> Moose
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|