The easiest explanation of that is focusing errors... which has been my
point all along.
Chuck Norcutt
Wayne Harridge wrote:
>> The brick wall is decidedly less sharp than the OM Z
>> even though it's operating at f/3.2 instead of f/2.8. That may be edge
>> of field resolution problems but the same would have been the case in
>> the original field/tree photo.
>>
>> Anybody care to join in?
>
> Ok, to me it looks like the OM Z 24 has better DOF behind the point of focus
> while the zoom has better DOF in front of the point of focus. Dunno if
> that's possible or not based on different lens designs, but that's how it
> "appears" to me. Perhaps the difference in brightness of the images has
> some psychological effect ?
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|