I've never used live view since the only camera I have that does it is
the Minolta A1. But if you tell me that you can *crisply* delineate
focus at 5 meters vs. 5.5 or even 6 meters using live view I'll agree
that the focusing part of my objection is moot. But that still leaves
the performance of the lenses at f/4.
Chuck Norcutt
Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Chuck Norcutt
> <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> All of your rebuttal has nothing to do with my argument which I
>> apparently didn't explain well enough. My point is simply that, at 5
>> meters, the depth of field at f/3.2 is sufficient that you can't
>> guarantee (even using a magnified image) that you were focused on the
>> same spot as the Zuiko. Even assuming a much tighter CoC, it would be
>> quite easy to focus beyond that point without being able to tell you had
>> done it.
>
> Getting the exact point of focus is a trivial feat with Live View when
> the 10x view is used. OK, it depends to some degree on the *point*
> used (a line or an edge is best), but it's not subject to rational
> doubt most of the time. That's why it is so useful.
>
> Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|