On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Chuck Norcutt
<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All of your rebuttal has nothing to do with my argument which I
> apparently didn't explain well enough. My point is simply that, at 5
> meters, the depth of field at f/3.2 is sufficient that you can't
> guarantee (even using a magnified image) that you were focused on the
> same spot as the Zuiko. Even assuming a much tighter CoC, it would be
> quite easy to focus beyond that point without being able to tell you had
> done it.
Getting the exact point of focus is a trivial feat with Live View when
the 10x view is used. OK, it depends to some degree on the *point*
used (a line or an edge is best), but it's not subject to rational
doubt most of the time. That's why it is so useful.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|