Subject: | Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:04:38 +1000 |
Thanks Mike, so the 50-200+1.4X gives me much the same range, same effective aperature at the short end but a stop faster at the long end, and I've got the 50-200 range covered too. Definitely worth considering. ...Wayne > Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Save your money. The relatively small size and low price make it > attractive and it really does perform well for this price point. However > > the 50-200 + 2x or 14x is much better. > > Mike > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Three recent darkroom prints, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Three recent darkroom prints, John Hudson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Wayne Harridge |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Mike Lazzari |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |