ML Archiv: Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm

Subject:	Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm
From:	Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:41:49 -0700

Save your money. The relatively small size and low price make it 
attractive and it really does perform well for this price point. However 
the 50-200 + 2x or 14x is much better.

Mike
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Requiem for print photography, (continued) Re: [OM] Requiem for print photography, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Requiem for print photography, Marc Lawrence Re: [OM] Requiem for print photography, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Requiem for print photography, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Requiem for print photography, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Requiem for print photography, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, GMcGrath Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Ken Norton Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Mike Lazzari <= Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Mike Lazzari Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Chuck Norcutt [OM] DZ 70-300mm, usher99

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Three recent darkroom prints, Ken Norton
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Three recent darkroom prints, Alan Brown
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Wayne Harridge
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm, Joel Wilcox
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]