But you have a 14-54 don't you, Brian? That's faster and has AF.
Chris
On 7 Jul 2010, at 12:04, Brian Swale wrote:
>>
>> As a matter of interest, why did you use the Zuiko 21/3.5? Were you just
>> playing with a lovely little lens?
>
> The photo (one of many) was taken in part of the living-room of the 'new'
> house. I needed the shortest focal-length lens I could fit on the E-1, as I
> was having problems getting far enough away from bouncy 7-year-olds and
> seeing around couches etc. I do have a Samyang 18-24 zoom but opted for
> the 21mm. I do have a 16mm f/2.8, but it's a Sigma fisheye. Wouldn't look
> good with straight lines involved.
>
> Remember that 21mm on 35mm film equates to 42mm on the E-1. I started
> out the evening with a 50mm lens but 100m equivalent was giving just head
> shots:-(
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|