Could well be, I don't know exactly where the break occurred but I
didn't mean to imply that 1TB was the break point. Only that we've been
through 1TB, 1.5TB and now 2TB. 1TB is probably old enough now to be
considered "stable". :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Jan Steinman wrote:
>> From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ... On the other hand, the change from horizontal to vertical
>> recording was a dramatic change of the entire technology... and no
>> one had ever been there before. Even so, I'd avoid 2TB drives in
>> favor of 1 or 1.5TB for a while. :-)
>
> I thought everything bigger than 750GB used vertical recording? Isn't
> 2TB just an increment on 1/1.5? I don't think there's new technology
> in there, just an elaboration of previous technology.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|