Thanks to everyone who looked and especially those who commented:
On 5/5/2010 6:27 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Wow, nice shot. That must be your 28-300 Tamron?
>
Indeed, the VC (IS) version I use for most of my shootin'.
On 5/5/2010 7:14 AM, Paul Cox wrote:
> Very nice. To get that close, you must be lighter on the feet, and quieter,
> than I - even with a zoom.
>
It was all the practice I'd just had sneaking up on the flora along that
trail. :-)
On 5/5/2010 8:49 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> Hi Moose,
>
> Beautiful composition and detail. Thanks for sharing.
Thank you!
On 5/5/2010 4:12 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Great shot. You did not even have to use the longest FL of the zoom.
>
I think it's a bit sharper at around 200mm than 300, although I haven't
done any real testing. The image size on the sensor isn't much
different, so I pulled it down a bit as I got closer.
> Thanks for posting.
My pleasure!
D. Quail Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|