Subject: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM lens size vs Leica M (e.g. 21mm f/2.0) |
---|---|
From: | Paul Cox <tastydoublecapp@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 4 May 2010 10:31:13 -0500 |
While I currently prefer film to digital, I think digital deserves a better place than Bud Lite. I can get a fair amount of enjoyment out of digital photography, Bud anything is another matter. That stuff ought not to be allowed to be called beer. The Guinness bit I complete agree with. Paul C <snip>digital is like "Bud Lite"</snip> -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Flash foul-up, what happened?, Charles Geilfuss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] I need new glasses - please - what is the best lens material these days?, Charles Geilfuss |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM lens size vs Leica M (e.g. 21mm f/2.0), Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM lens size vs Leica M (e.g. 21mm f/2.0), Paul Cox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |