Subject: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5, 35/2, and Zuikoholism |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:40:27 -0600 |
I could probably survive rather nicely with just the 35-80 F2.8 lens. But if it's primes, of my current kit, I'd take the 24 F2.8, 50 F3.5 and 100 F2.8. Or if I were to be a little crazy, I'd substitute the 200 F4 for the 50 F3.5 and pack extension tubes. Two lenses? Only two? Easy answer for me. The 35 F2.8 and the 100 F2.8. The real question is which two camera bodies? :) AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5, 35/2, and Zuikoholism, Jim Loudon |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Famous Zuiko for sale, Carlos J. Santisteban |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5, 35/2, and Zuikoholism, Jim Loudon |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5, 35/2, and Zuikoholism, Sue Pearce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |