ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,

Subject:	Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,
From:	Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:37:16 +1100

Yes - the shoulder is a bit overemphasised too - is that what you  
meant? :-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 03/03/2010, at 9:23 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> I'd agree there is some exaggeration but it doesn't hit you in the  
> face.
>  Of course, there may be other distractions that prevent that.  :-)

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, (continued) Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Dawid Loubser Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, John Hudson Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Jez Cunningham Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Andrew Fildes <= Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Sue Pearce [OM] Perspective on distortion [was Certainly a beaten subject already, ], Moose Re: [OM] Perspective on distortion [was Certainly a beaten subject already, ], Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, manuel viet Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, manuel viet Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, manuel viet

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Date:	[OM] New? fast prime for MFT, usher99
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,, Sue Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]