I don't using the mapping, at the moment, Marc. But the in UI is nicely
improved, I think, and using different libraries is simple now.
Your Aperture library is upgraded with the change of version, but that didn't
take too long (only around 8,000 files in Aperture). What will take me a
loooong time is integrating my iPhoto library with my Aperture library. I have
used iPhoto on my MacBook Pro to catalogue photos from work, mostly of my
students. But I am moving all that to Aperture. I did it once before, but
made a mess of it; I am now going to make it much, much tidier.
But no memory leaks so far ...
Chris
On 16 Feb 2010, at 11:36, Marc Lawrence wrote:
> There have been some reports of people experiencing a "memory leak"
> problem, whereby leaving Aperture running overnight has lead to it
> eating all disk space while grabbing "virtual memory". I've not heard
> more though, but I'm keeping an eye out. I'm doing other work that
> puts aside Aperture upgrading at the moment (scanning the late
> mother-out-law's years of slides).
>
> I'm interested in seeing how mapping integrates. As part of image
> management, it's a precision that I've long desired as part of my
> whole time-and-place relationship with photography.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|