Ken wrote
> I added a sample photograph from the 35-80 to the Gary Reese lens review
> on the Zone-10 webite.
>
> To add a perspective to this... The photograph was taken with the E-1,
> which means that this is only 25% of the surface area of the full-frame
> 35mm frame!!!! I did resize to fit the screen, but only by about 50%. RAW
> converted in Olympus Studio, post-processed in Picture Window Pro for
> curves (stained glass window light and florescent interior lighting messed
> the white balance up). Mostly desaturated and pixel-sharpened to counter
> the AA filter.
>
> Not too shabby for the E-1, eh?
Lovely portrait, and sharp; but with a file comprising nearly 500kb, it
SHOULD be full of detail.
I agree with Nathan; if her right eye is examined with the magnifying glass of
FastStone, and even without it, it seems to have a curve of reflective tiny
bubbles on it. I've never seen that kind of artifact in a pic before.
CRT monitor; Compaq Presario V410, which seems to have good colour
and detail. I'd prefer the larger Viewsonic CRT monitor I bought for this
machine but there isn't space on my computer desk for two monitors; and I
have two computers sharing the same space.
Brian Swale.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|