I did not forget the aperture, I am 100% sure it was 2.8. There might have been
some haze, or else my GF-1 is good at dealing with highlights.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://wajsman.smugmug.com
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> The exposure guideline for the full moon (which is illuminated by full
> sun) is 1 stop less than the sunny 16 rule... call it moony 11?
>
> Nathan's exposure is already almost 2 stops over that so there was
> presumably a lot of haze or else he forgot the actual aperture. Chris'
> exposure is way more than that.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> That's way too much exposure, Chris. My moon image was shot at ISO
>> 100, 1/320 sec. at f2.8 (the aperture is not in the exif but I
>> remember having the 90mm Elmarit wide open).
>>
>> Cheers, Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://wajsman.smugmug.com http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>
>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog:
>> http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>>
>>> I had a go and got nothing like Brian's excellent result. My
>>> efforts resulted in a large round blown highlight -- ƒ4, 1/6,
>>> ISO400 with a 50-200 on my E-3. I was impressed with the IS, but
>>> not the banded noise when I tried to raise the shadows.
>>>
>>> I shall have to re-think this exposure lark.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1 Feb 2010, at 01:49, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice indeed. Cool use of the Z. 75-150. I too liked Nathan's
>>>> shots as well. It was a special Wolf moon--right at its
>>>> perigee--thus 14% larger and 30% brighter. I thought about going
>>>> out and giving it a go, (five seconds) but it was windy and in
>>>> the single digits. Glad others did a nice job. Oh, always
>>>> thought the moon looked larger at the horizon, but that is
>>>> apparently an illusion.
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|