That's way too much exposure, Chris. My moon image was shot at ISO 100, 1/320
sec. at f2.8 (the aperture is not in the exif but I remember having the 90mm
Elmarit wide open).
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://wajsman.smugmug.com
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I had a go and got nothing like Brian's excellent result. My efforts
> resulted in a large round blown highlight -- ƒ4, 1/6, ISO400 with a 50-200 on
> my E-3. I was impressed with the IS, but not the banded noise when I tried
> to raise the shadows.
>
> I shall have to re-think this exposure lark.
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 1 Feb 2010, at 01:49, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Nice indeed. Cool use of the Z. 75-150. I too liked Nathan's shots as
>> well. It was a special Wolf moon--right at its perigee--thus 14%
>> larger and 30% brighter.
>> I thought about going out and giving it a go, (five seconds) but it
>> was windy and in the single digits. Glad others did a nice job. Oh,
>> always thought the moon looked larger at the horizon, but that is
>> apparently an illusion.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|