Subject: | Re: [OM] Pictage.com |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:02:32 -0600 |
> > I also tried a print on metallic paper recently. It wasn't a portrait > but an indoor architectural shot. I figured it might be OK on metallic > paper but the look totally turned me off. I won't try it again on any > subject. I have one picture in particular of the John Hancock building which is printed on metallic. Simply amazing. The image is nearly 3D and the sun glinting off the steel and glass look absolutely real on the metallic paper. At my desk I have a 24x30 of it on normal paper and the picture is really nice, but side-by-side with the metallic it's the difference between having a picture of the sky taped to the ceiling of your car vs having the sunroof open. OK, maybe a little hyperbole... AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] On Warts and all (was "film stuff from the holidays"), Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Advice on 90/2 lens repair - broken off metal piece on reat, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Pictage.com, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Pictage.com, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |