Ken Norton wrote:
>> After about a month of "this is Becky from "Pictahhje", I knew that even
>> if I was willing to hand over much of the control to them, which I was
>> not, they were pretty expensive, and also persistently annoying. Not a
>> program for me at all, but YMMV.
>>
>
>
>
> Hmm. Now you have my attention. Do they try to drag extra dollars out of
> your customers like they do you? It's a little cheesy, but business is
> business (according to the CDFO), and an aggressive sales staff might not be
> a bad thing.
>
You have a point. I just know that for myself, I hate high pressure
sales tactics. There are few things that turn me off faster.
There are pros and cons to it, I suppose.
> BTW, you mentioned metallic. I've only found a couple of my pictures to look
> good on metallic paper. There is nothing that says "gross" like a portrait
> on metallic. I know that it's the flavor of the day, but I can't wait for
> this fad to pass. The pictures other photographers have shown me of which
> they are so proud of just makes me twitch.
>
I agree with you, which is why I wanted to see the print for myself.
I have seen one sepia print on that paper that looked nice, but that's
the only one that I have personally seen that I liked on the metallic paper.
> There. I've said it. Let the flames begin.
>
No flames from me, although the extra warmth it generates might be nice. ;-)
Candace
> AG (nomex) Schnozz
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|