ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees

from Chris Barker

Subject:	Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees
From:	Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:26:02 +0000

Just what I thought when they agreed ... :-)

Chris

On 16 Jan 2010, at 02:16, Andrew Fildes wrote:

> If they hired Chris back, it's obvious that they are unconcerned with  
> their image. :-)

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] RAW files in non Oly applications, was Foggy trees, (continued) Re: [OM] RAW files in non Oly applications, was Foggy trees, Chris Barker Re: [OM] RAW files in non Oly applications, was Foggy trees, Ken Norton Re: [OM] RAW files in non Oly applications, was Foggy trees, Candace Lemarr Re: [OM] RAW files in non Oly applications, was Foggy trees, Chris Barker Re: [OM] RAW files in non Oly applications, was Foggy trees, Ken Norton Re: [OM] RAW files in non Oly applications, was Foggy trees, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Moose Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Chris Barker <= Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Chris Barker

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Chris Barker
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] (OM) Zuikoholic meeting friend, Brian Swale
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Andrew Fildes
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees, Chris Barker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]