Mike Lazzari wrote:
>
> To share some new to me info about the E620.
> <http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse620/page17.asp> See Shadow
> Adjustment Technology paragraph. I was getting way too much shadow noise
> which is explained in the article.
>
> Mike
I don't use digicams very much and the little I know about them I learn
here on the list. (I shoot film 99% of the time.)
I read the section you referenced on
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse620/page17.asp
and continued reading to the Overall Image Quality / Specifics section
at the bottom.
There it says
"The only real issue we experienced (and even then, only very
occasionally), was the E-620's difficulty in capturing certain shades of
purple. It's an extremely minor complaint (the likelihood of most people
noticing it is tiny),"
TINY? The reviewer has to be kidding. I'd be really upset if I saw the
image on the right and the camera gave me the one on the left. It takes
quite a bit of fiddling with blue hue(+30) and saturation(-30) on the
camera jpeg to get even close to the "approximation of actual color"
image. I've never had to make such drastic adjustments on raw print film
scans to get an image to ~match what I saw. (& I've done a lot.)
I'm certainly not knocking your E620 (or the E20) as your images always
look fine to me, but the whole thing amazes me.
Am I missing something here?
imwtk.
--
Russ Butler (NJ USA)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|