The comment about no evidence of diffraction at f/11 would imply that
the lens is not resolving more than about 4MP of the 12 available.
Chuck Norcutt
usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Thanks for the link. I was surprised by all the "ghosting even with
> the Z. 50/1.4." This appears to be mediated by reflections off the
> rear element. I don't really understand why there is so much
> difference on MFT. Any ideas? He mentions registration distance as a
> factor but with the proper adapter the distance from the rear element
> to the sensor/film is the same of course. With the OM 5D classic or
> Mk11 IIRC, the Tam 90/2.8 macro had an issue but very few other lenses.
> I hope the Zuiko macros work well on MFT.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25/12/2009, at 12:15 AM, David Irisarri Vila wrote:
>
>> Anyone interested can find all OM lenses attached to E-P1 here:
>>
>> http://www.biofos.com/cornucop/omz_ep1.html
>>
>> There is also OM 40/2.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|