My Zuikos can't get into that equation, alas. I know contemporary Oly
doesn't care about that, but they must be considering some way to get
to FF. If mirrorless cameras are the future, why wouldn't that be a
great new way for them to introduce FF? Along with a line of f2
primes (OK, I'm really getting into the Christmas spirit now...)
Joel W.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:12 AM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> wrote:
> m4/3s are already FF,
> so long as you use m4/3 lenses ..
> ok I'm out
> Phx
>
>
> Le 25 nov. 09 à 14:04, Joel Wilcox a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Carlos J. Santisteban
>> <zuiko21@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> With FF body the size benifit will be lost not to mention the
>>>> potential
>>>> high prices.
>>>
>>> Not necesarily -- the E-P1, GF-1, Sigma DP-x aren't much larger
>>> than other
>>> serious compacts in the market, despite having much larger sensors.
>>> The
>>> lenses is a different matter, but we're talking about adapters...
>>
>> Here is what I wish. I wish Oly would use the advent ('tis the
>> season) of m4/3 to get into FF. By that I mean introduce micro FF.
>> It would be larger than the E-P1, as you suggest, but would capitalize
>> on the concept. It would be an elegant way for Olympus to enter into
>> this area of competition. A killer EVF would really help too. Their
>> lens offerings for m4/3 are not so deep that they couldn't ratchet up
>> a new FF line of lenses for a mFF system. Or am I missing something?
>>
>> Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|