m4/3s are already FF,
so long as you use m4/3 lenses ..
ok I'm out
Phx
Le 25 nov. 09 à 14:04, Joel Wilcox a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Carlos J. Santisteban
> <zuiko21@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> With FF body the size benifit will be lost not to mention the
>>> potential
>>> high prices.
>>
>> Not necesarily -- the E-P1, GF-1, Sigma DP-x aren't much larger
>> than other
>> serious compacts in the market, despite having much larger sensors.
>> The
>> lenses is a different matter, but we're talking about adapters...
>
> Here is what I wish. I wish Oly would use the advent ('tis the
> season) of m4/3 to get into FF. By that I mean introduce micro FF.
> It would be larger than the E-P1, as you suggest, but would capitalize
> on the concept. It would be an elegant way for Olympus to enter into
> this area of competition. A killer EVF would really help too. Their
> lens offerings for m4/3 are not so deep that they couldn't ratchet up
> a new FF line of lenses for a mFF system. Or am I missing something?
>
> Joel W.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|