Only if you're attending the Christmas party for the Kodak sensor
development engineering group.
Chuck Norcutt
Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> siddiq@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Q4. How many different colors of Green Detectors are used int he KAF5101C
>>>> sensor?
>>>> A4. Two. They are identical except half of them have slightly more red
>>>> sensitivity
>>>>
>>> They can’t be “identical” and go on to have “slightly more red sensitivity.”
>>>
>> Thanks for that. I hate to always be the one.
>
> I think there is an equivocation involved. Sameness can apply either
> to the thing itself or to attributes of a thing. By "identical" I
> suspect Ken means "attributes which are the same," not that they are
> the same in every respect, i.e., not the same things in themselves.
>
> But for those of us who are mostly content when things work and don't
> always have to know exactly how they work, is there a subtext of all
> this? Is the KAF5101C better or worse in terms of these
> characteristics? Is this just kind of interesting? Why should I
> care? Should I bring this up at parties?
>
> Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|