Gents,
If you're happy with what you're getting, why make yourself unhappy?
I agree that the difference is slight.
Chris, in what respects do you notice a difference? I'm just curious.
I'll be happy to tell you what I see (but don't want to lead you).
Joel W.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I have been reading the recent thread with interest, since I have never
> installed Olympus Master, but chose to use PSE 6.0 for RAW conversion. I
> appreciate your observations. I think I will continue to use the PSE
> converter, since I have never observed the problems that have been
> discussed.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 12:01 PM
> Subject: [OM] Olympus Master at RAW conversion
>
>
>> Well, based on Ken's opinion (some months ago) and Joel's observation in
>> the last few days. I decided to do a quick test of the output of Master
>> on a .ORF file. Master's image was indeed more pleasing than the output
>> from Aperture or Picasa, but only slightly. And considering how
>> unpleasant it is to use Master, I have no difficulty in deciding to work
>> harder at the processing with Aperture, LightZone or even Picasa.
>>
>> Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|